[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061003092339.999d0011.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 09:23:39 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc: akpm <akpm@...l.org>, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Math-emu kills the kernel on Athlon64 X2
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 08:10:07 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > OK, how about something more direct and less obtrusive, like this?
>
> I think this is fine, but I also think it's a bit hacky.
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to make the whole "nofxsr" thing just clear
> the capability, ie just a diff like the appended...
>
> Does that work for you? If so, we should _also_ make sure that "no387"
> calls this function too, so that you don't have to do _both_ no387 and
> nofxsr, which is clearly silly. Once you do no387, the kernel should do
> the nofxsr for you, methinks..
Yes, that works.
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c
> index 2799baa..7ac3c9e 100644
> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ static void __cpuinit get_cpu_vendor(str
> static int __init x86_fxsr_setup(char * s)
> {
> disable_x86_fxsr = 1;
> + clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_FXSR, boot_cpu_data.x86_capability);
> return 1;
> }
> __setup("nofxsr", x86_fxsr_setup);
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists