[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49mz8c6k83.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 13:53:32 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] call truncate_inode_pages in the DIO fallback to buffered I/O path
==> Regarding Re: [patch] call truncate_inode_pages in the DIO fallback to buffered I/O path; Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com> adds:
>> Why is this a problem? It's just like someone did a write(), and we'll
>> invalidate the pagecache on the next direct-io operation.
zach.brown> This was noticed as a distro regression as they moved from the
zach.brown> kernels that used to invalidate the entire address space on
zach.brown> direct io ops to more modern ones that only invalidate the
zach.brown> region being written.
Right.
zach.brown> You can end up with significant memory pressure after this
zach.brown> change with a large enough working set on disk.
>> eek. truncate_inode_pages() will throw away dirty data. Very
>> dangerous, much chin-scratching needed.
zach.brown> Yeah, I failed to tell Jeff that it should be calling
zach.brown> filemap_fdatawrite() first to get things into writeback. (And
zach.brown> presumably not truncating if that returns an error.)
Ahh, that explains it. The strange thing is that my test validates the
file afterwards, and I was seeing correct data.
I'll repost after another round of testing.
Thanks!
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists