[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1159990345.1386.277.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:32:25 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: Industrial device driver uio/uio_*
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 12:18 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 19:59:54 +0100
> > I would just NAK it but want to be sure the guys saw the list of
> > problems
> >
>
> cc's added.
>
> Thomas has been a bit tied up with timers and interrupts of late.
Yup. fork(tglx) still returns -ETOOMANYINSTANCES.
I have no objections, if you pull it from -mm for now. The list of flaws
is accepted and we'll work on this in foreseeable time, _IF_ there is
some basic consensus about the idea itself not being fundamentaly wrong.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists