[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45240D4E.7090500@aknet.ru>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 23:36:46 +0400
From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
Hi.
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> and chmod o-x bash ....
> at which point.. game over.
> (and yes you can do in bash pretty much what you can do in perl. heck
> you can prove that.. shell is turning complete ;)
Can I do a syscalls from a bash script?
But in any case, I am not going to suggest any
solution against a script-loader - the mmap change
doesn't prevent that too.
Instead I'd like to evaluate a few ideas about an
ld.so problem. One of which is to _enforce_ the "noexec",
just as you asked for. :)
Please have a look at this patch:
http://uwsg.ucs.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0610.0/1402.html
The primary goal is to make access() to respect the "noexec".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists