[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4524101E.4090202@aknet.ru>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 23:48:46 +0400
From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
Hi.
Jesper Juhl wrote:
> So first you mount /dev/shm with 'noexec', thereby telling the system
> "please make shared memory non executable".
Well, what do I want to tell to the system when
mounting /dev/shm with "noexec" is a difficult
point to discuss. In my opinion (and it was so
for ages) I only tell it to not execute the
binaries from there. In your opinion I am saying
to make the shared memory not executable, but on
the other hand I am just mmaping some file, and
mmaping a file with PROT_EXEC never required an
exec perm for that file, so I wonder why "noexec"
is different here.
But as I said, this is a bit difficult to discuss,
so I was trying to avoid touching MAP_SHARED for now.
Please tell me how your logic applies to MAP_PRIVATE
instead, which is affected the same way. (considering
mprotect, MAP_ANONYMOUS then read(), "ro" not denying
PROT_WRITE, etc)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists