linux-kernel - Re: sunifdef instead of unifdef

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061005134734.GA5335@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru>
Date:	Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:47:34 +0400
From:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:	Dennis Heuer <dh@...ple-media.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sunifdef instead of unifdef

On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03:08:16PM +0200, Dennis Heuer wrote:
> unifdef is not only very old and unmaintained, the binary does not work
> and the source does not compile on a pure x86_64 system. There is
> another tool that worked for me--though it 'closed with remarks'--and
> that was updated recently (several times this year). It is called
> sunifdef, is under an equal (new) BSD license, and is proposed to be
> the successor of unifdef. See the project page:
>
> http://www.sunifdef.strudl.org/

What about posting compiler errors instead of suggesting something that
is 10 times bigger?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/