| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1160059253.26064.69.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:40:53 +0100 From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> To: Dennis Heuer <dh@...ple-media.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dot@...at.at Subject: Re: sunifdef instead of unifdef On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 15:08 +0200, Dennis Heuer wrote: > unifdef is not only very old and unmaintained, the binary does not work > and the source does not compile on a pure x86_64 system. It works for me. Describe your problem more coherently. I wouldn't describe it as 'very old' -- the last commit seems to have been last March, which isn't _so_ recent but perhaps it just hasn't _needed_ an update? Neither would I describe it as unmaintained. Tony was quite quickly responsive when I asked him if it would be OK to include unifdef in the kernel source tree. > There is another tool that worked for me--though it 'closed with > remarks'--and that was updated recently (several times this year). It > is called sunifdef, is under an equal (new) BSD license, and is > proposed to be the successor of unifdef. See the project page: > > http://www.sunifdef.strudl.org/ I don't see a huge point in changing, unless it lets us get rid of stuff like #if defined(__KERNEL__ && .... when used with -U__KERNEL__. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists