[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <452673AC.1080602@garzik.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:18:04 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, torvalds@...l.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: [PATCH, RAW] IRQ: Maintain irq number globally rather than passing
to IRQ handlers
Here is the raw, un-split-up first pass of the irq argument removal
patch (500K): http://gtf.org/garzik/misc/patch.irq-remove
Notes:
* raw first pass, DO NOT APPLY.
* this was useful work: it turned up several minor bugs
* Do we mark irq handlers FASTCALL? If not, we probably can now.
* I also turned up a few obvious places that dhowells missed in his
pt_regs patch, inevitably in non-x86 arches that probably were not built.
* I need to fix up ~10 or so drivers that called their interrupt
handlers directly, then used a 'irq == 0' test to determine whether the
interrupt handler was called internally, or by the system.
* not sure yet if I want to mark the parport "irq handler" functions as
truly irqreturn_t
* Hopefully I will have this polished by the end of the day.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists