linux-kernel - Re: [patch] honour MNT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4527D64A.7060002@redhat.com>
Date:	Sat, 07 Oct 2006 09:31:06 -0700
From:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To:	Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>
CC:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] honour MNT_NOEXEC for access()

Stas Sergeev wrote:
> Now, as the access(X_OK) is fixed, would it be
> feasible for ld.so to start using it?

Just must be kidding.  No access control can be reliably implemented at
userlevel.  There is no point starting something as stupid as this.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (252 bytes)