[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160239878.21411.3.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 09:51:18 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, johnstul@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] -mm: clocksource: increase initcall priority
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 00:40 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> writes:
>
> > Index: linux-2.6.17/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.17.orig/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
> > +++ linux-2.6.17/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
> > @@ -174,4 +174,4 @@ pm_good:
> > return clocksource_register(&clocksource_acpi_pm);
> > }
> >
> > -module_init(init_acpi_pm_clocksource);
> > +postcore_initcall(init_acpi_pm_clocksource);
>
> Current code is assumeing DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY() is called before
> init_acpi_pm_clocksource().
>
> We'll need to change it.
We can add a call to clocksource_rating_change() inside
acpi_pm_need_workaround(), are there deeper dependencies?
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists