[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d594qa4o.fsf@duaron.myhome.or.jp>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 03:00:23 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, johnstul@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] -mm: clocksource: increase initcall priority
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> writes:
> On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 00:40 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>> Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> writes:
>>
>> > Index: linux-2.6.17/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
>> > ===================================================================
>> > --- linux-2.6.17.orig/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
>> > +++ linux-2.6.17/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
>> > @@ -174,4 +174,4 @@ pm_good:
>> > return clocksource_register(&clocksource_acpi_pm);
>> > }
>> >
>> > -module_init(init_acpi_pm_clocksource);
>> > +postcore_initcall(init_acpi_pm_clocksource);
>>
>> Current code is assumeing DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY() is called before
>> init_acpi_pm_clocksource().
>>
>> We'll need to change it.
>
> We can add a call to clocksource_rating_change() inside
> acpi_pm_need_workaround(), are there deeper dependencies?
There is no deeper dependencies. If it's meaning
clocksource_reselect() in current git, it sounds good to me.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists