[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160319015.5686.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:50:15 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, johnstul@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu,
zippel@...ux-m68k.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + clocksource-update-kernel-parameters.patch added to -mm tree
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 07:47 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 11:59 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 18:53 -0700, akpm@...l.org wrote:
> > > Documents two new kernel parameters,
> > >
> > > timeofday_clocksource
> > > sched_clocksource
> > >
> > > Removed old ones,
> > >
> > > clocksource
> > > clock
> >
> > NAK.
> >
> > clocksource has just replaced clock. This hit mainline in 2.6.18.
> >
> > 1. we can not remove "clock" without a grace perdiod
> > 2. we can not change the just created new parameter clocksource again.
>
> True, I've been thinking about this.. I was think I could deprecate
> "clocksource" and "clock" but keep them around like John originally had.
We really do not need another set of those. clocksource and
sched_clocksource is perfectly fine
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists