[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160319112.5686.8.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:51:52 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, johnstul@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu,
zippel@...ux-m68k.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + clocksource-add-generic-sched_clock.patch added to -mm tree
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 07:45 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 11:55 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 18:53 -0700, akpm@...l.org wrote:
> > > Adds a generic sched_clock, along with a boot time override for the scheduler
> > > clocksource (sched_clocksource). Hopefully the config option would eventually
> > > be removed.
> >
> > Again, this belongs into the clocksource code and not into sched.c
> >
> > Your patch series scatters clock source related code snippets all over
> > the place. This becomes simply a maintenance nightmare.
>
> It's an API, it's suppose to be used in different places.
Err. clocksource is an API and it is supposed to be at a place, where
clocksource code is.
sched_clock is a user of the clocksource API and there is absolutely no
reason to put that into sched.c
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists