[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a8748490610080829r54053e14ud8c7b02c8f39476c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 17:29:01 +0200
From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Minor coding style fix
On 08/10/06, Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...il.com> wrote:
> Kernel generally follow the style
>
> if (func()) {
> /* failed case */
> } else {
> /* success */
> }
>
>
Please submit patches inline, having to copy them from attachments to
be able to reply is a pain.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
> index 98489d8..55cb77c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sys.c
> +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_notifier_call_cha
> void srcu_init_notifier_head(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh)
> {
> mutex_init(&nh->mutex);
> - if (init_srcu_struct(&nh->srcu) < 0)
> + if (init_srcu_struct(&nh->srcu))
> BUG();
> nh->head = NULL;
> }
I really liked the old code better. If in the future
init_srcu_struct() is changed to also return >0 for some conditions,
then that would not previously have triggered BUG(), but after your
changes it will. The code, as it were, perfectly expressed what it
wanted to happen - if it returns less than zero it's a BUG().
I say leave it alone.
--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists