linux-kernel - Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1160350543.3693.238.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date:	Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:35:43 -0700
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	tglx@...utronix.de
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, johnstul@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	zippel@...ux-m68k.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm
	tree

On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 00:53 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 15:13 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 23:38 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > I don't see that behaviour on my machines and nobody complains about
> > > that. I don't care about stale comments. Point me to a bug report
> > > instead of your perception of what's optimal and not.
> > 
> > Let both do this. Lets discuss empirical behavior. Otherwise we aren't
> > making any progress. 
> 
> Go, grep the LKML archives and let those who had problems test your
> modifications. Come back when they confirm that it does not change
> anything.

This is why I want this to go into -mm .. To flush out the corner cases
that it's impossible for me to find on my own.

> You want to change behaviour of the current code, so it's your job to
> verify that it does not break anything.

I have, within my ability to do so.

> I have been there and done that with the ARM interrupt code
> http://www.linutronix.de/index.php?page=testing
> 
> I know what I'm talking about.

I think you know what your talking about, and I respect your opinion.. I
think you have some points, that I will follow up on. However most of
what your saying comes off to me like, "Reverse _all_ your changes!" ,
"Makes this patch set go away for 2 months", and I don't understand
where that is coming from.

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/