[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160376987.5686.160.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 08:56:26 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, johnstul@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu,
zippel@...ux-m68k.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm
tree
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 16:35 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> I think you know what your talking about, and I respect your opinion.. I
> think you have some points, that I will follow up on. However most of
> what your saying comes off to me like, "Reverse _all_ your changes!" ,
> "Makes this patch set go away for 2 months", and I don't understand
> where that is coming from.
I did nowhere say, that you should revert _ALL_ your changes ! If you
need 2 month to fixup the issues I pointed at , I can't help it.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists