linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lockdep: annotate nfs/nfsd in-kernel sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 09 Oct 2006 07:57:35 -0400
From:	Steve Dickson <SteveD@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC:	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: annotate nfs/nfsd in-kernel sockets

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 18:24 +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
>>
>>That is very much an nfs-client issue, so reclassifying the
>>server-side sockets seems irrelevant.  Doesn't cause any harm though I
>>suppose.
> 
> 
> SteveD had a case that required the svc change, Steve was that the same
> trace or another?
Through some simply 'hello world' server testing, I as able to
make these locking dependence warnings pop...

steved.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/