linux-kernel - Re: [patch 3/3] mm: fault handler to replace nopage and populate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 09 Oct 2006 22:07:50 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] mm: fault handler to replace nopage and populate

On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 13:58 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 09:49:31PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 13:45 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 09:32:59PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > You'll want to clear VM_PFNMAP after unmapping all pages from it, before
> > > > > switching to struct page backing.
> > > > 
> > > > Which means having a list of all vma's ... I suppose I can look at the
> > > > truncate code to do that race free but I was hoping I could avoid it
> > > > (that's the whole point of using unmap_mapping_range() in fact).
> > > 
> > > Yeah I don't think there is any other way to do it.
> > 
> > What is the problem if I always keep VM_PFNMAP set ?
> 
> The VM won't see that you have struct pages backing the ptes, and won't
> do the right refcounting or rmap stuff... But for file backed mappings,
> all the critical rmap stuff should be set up at mmap time, so you might
> have another option to simply always do the nopfn thing, as far as the
> VM is concerned (ie. even when you do have a struct page)

Any reason why it wouldn't work to flip that bit on the first no_page()
after a migration ? A migration always involves destroying all PTEs and
is done with a per-object mutex held that no_page() takes too, so we can
be pretty sure that the first nopage can set that bit before any PTE is
actually inserted in the mapping after all the previous ones have been
invalidated... That would avoid having to walk the vma's.

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/