[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200610091500.24131.eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 15:00:18 +0200
From: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, akpm <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel-doc: drop __must_check and various "inline" qualifiers
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
>
> Drop __inline, __always_inline, noinline, and __must_check in the
> produced kernel-doc output, similar to other pseudo directives.
The inline status of a function is not of much help for a developer, that's
right. But I would like to see the the __must_check in the documentation.
This it what makes a difference, the inline stuff is extraneous.
Eike
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists