[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061009081527.d37a1c22.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 08:15:27 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, akpm <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: drop various "inline" qualifiers
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 15:00:18 +0200 Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> The inline status of a function is not of much help for a developer, that's
> right. But I would like to see the the __must_check in the documentation.
> This it what makes a difference, the inline stuff is extraneous.
---
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Drop __inline, __always_inline, and noinline in the
produced kernel-doc output, similar to other pseudo directives.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
---
scripts/kernel-doc | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- linux-2619-rc1g3.orig/scripts/kernel-doc
+++ linux-2619-rc1g3/scripts/kernel-doc
@@ -1518,6 +1518,9 @@ sub dump_function($$) {
$prototype =~ s/^asmlinkage +//;
$prototype =~ s/^inline +//;
$prototype =~ s/^__inline__ +//;
+ $prototype =~ s/^__inline +//;
+ $prototype =~ s/^__always_inline +//;
+ $prototype =~ s/^noinline +//;
$prototype =~ s/__devinit +//;
$prototype =~ s/^#define +//; #ak added
$prototype =~ s/__attribute__ \(\([a-z,]*\)\)//;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists