[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160426713.7752.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 06:45:13 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Thomas Hellstrom <thomas@...gstengraphics.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] mm: fault handler to replace nopage and populate
> Wouldn't that confuse concurrent readers?
>
> Could it be an option to make it safe for the fault handler to
> temporarily drop the mmap_sem read lock given that some conditions TBD
> are met?
> In that case it can retake the mmap_sem write lock, do the VMA flags
> modifications, downgrade and do the pte modifications using a helper, or
> even use remap_pfn_range() during the time the write lock is held?
If we return NOPAGE_REFAULT, then yes, we can drop the mmap sem, though
I 'm not sure we need that...
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists