[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061009204644.GB4707@filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:46:44 -0400
From: Josef Sipek <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, notting@...hat.com,
torvalds@...l.org, hch@...radead.org, viro@....linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce vfs_listxattr
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 01:33:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:10:48 -0400
> Josef Sipek <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu> wrote:
>
> > This patch moves code out of fs/xattr.c:listxattr into a new function -
> > vfs_listxattr. The code for vfs_listxattr was originally submitted by Bill
> > Nottingham <notting@...hat.com> to Unionfs.
>
> That tells us what the patch does. In general, please be sure to also tell
> us *why* you prepared a patch.
>
> Does this patch allow unionfs to be loaded into an otherwise unpatched
> kernel.org kernel? If so, that seems to be a good reason for including
> this patch into the mainline kernel.
Sorry about that. The reason for this submission is to make the listxattr
code in fs/xattr.c a little cleaner (as well as to clean up some code in
Unionfs.)
Currently, Unionfs has vfs_listxattr defined in its code. I think that's
very ugly, and I'd like to see it (re)moved. The logical place to put it, is
along side of all the other vfs_*xattr functions. Overall, I think this
patch is benefitial for both kernel.org kernel and Unionfs.
Josef "Jeff" Sipek.
--
Humans were created by water to transport it upward.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists