[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160571241.19143.318.camel@amol.verismonetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:24:01 +0530
From: Amol Lad <amol@...ismonetworks.com>
To: linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: James.Bottomley@...eleye.com,
kernel Janitors <kernel-janitors@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] drivers/scsi/ibmmca.c: Replacing yield() with a better
alternative
In 2.6, the semantics of calling yield() changed from "sleep for a
bit" to "I really don't want to run for a while". This matches POSIX
better, but there's a lot of drivers still using yield() when they mean
cond_resched(), schedule() or even schedule_timeout().
For this driver cond_resched() seems to be a better
alternative
Tested compile only
Signed-off-by: Amol Lad <amol@...ismonetworks.com>
---
diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.19-rc1-orig/Documentation/dontdiff linux-2.6.19-rc1-orig/drivers/scsi/ibmmca.c linux-2.6.19-rc1/drivers/scsi/ibmmca.c
--- linux-2.6.19-rc1-orig/drivers/scsi/ibmmca.c 2006-09-21 10:15:39.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc1/drivers/scsi/ibmmca.c 2006-10-11 17:57:02.000000000 +0530
@@ -2268,7 +2268,7 @@ static int __ibmmca_host_reset(Scsi_Cmnd
if (!(inb(IM_STAT_REG(host_index)) & IM_BUSY))
break;
spin_unlock_irq(shpnt->host_lock);
- yield();
+ cond_resched();
spin_lock_irq(shpnt->host_lock);
}
/*write registers and enable system interrupts */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists