[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160589175.16513.58.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:52:55 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Amol Lad <amol@...ismonetworks.com>
Cc: linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James.Bottomley@...eleye.com,
kernel Janitors <kernel-janitors@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c: Replacing yield() with a
better alternative
Ar Mer, 2006-10-11 am 18:24 +0530, ysgrifennodd Amol Lad:
> For this driver schedule_timeout_schedule() seems to be a better
> alternative.
>
> *Please see if the function should be called with 1 jiffy delay or more
> is better*
You want cond_resched() for this driver as its polling the hardware for
a change that should occur very soon. (Actually you want to throw the
hardware in the bin)
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists