[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0610111649440.6437-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:51:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>
cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, <gregkh@...e.de>,
Paolo Abeni <paolo.abeni@...il.it>,
<linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] usbmon: add binary interface
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:44:43 +0000, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> > Does it mean text interface is now deprecated? Or perhaps ioctl should
> > be added to text interface too? Or maybe we do not need binary
> > interface if we allow resizing on text interface?
>
> I haven't reviewed Paolo's patch yet, but with that in mind:
> - No, text is not deprecated yet. That is only possible when a simplified
> command-line tool is written and distributed (e.g. usbmon(8)).
> - No, I do not think an ioctl in debugfs or a text API is a good idea.
> - Resizing on text interface magnifies sprintf contribution to CPU burn,
> so once we have the binary one, there's only disadvantage and
> no advantage in implementing that.
Would relayfs be a better choice than debugfs for exporting potentially
large quantities of binary data?
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists