[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061011210137.GA16427@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:01:37 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
Paolo Abeni <paolo.abeni@...il.it>,
linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] usbmon: add binary interface
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 04:51:09PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:44:43 +0000, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz> wrote:
> >
> > > Does it mean text interface is now deprecated? Or perhaps ioctl should
> > > be added to text interface too? Or maybe we do not need binary
> > > interface if we allow resizing on text interface?
> >
> > I haven't reviewed Paolo's patch yet, but with that in mind:
> > - No, text is not deprecated yet. That is only possible when a simplified
> > command-line tool is written and distributed (e.g. usbmon(8)).
> > - No, I do not think an ioctl in debugfs or a text API is a good idea.
> > - Resizing on text interface magnifies sprintf contribution to CPU burn,
> > so once we have the binary one, there's only disadvantage and
> > no advantage in implementing that.
>
> Would relayfs be a better choice than debugfs for exporting potentially
> large quantities of binary data?
You can put relayfs files in debugfs. Or at least that was the goal a
long time ago, hopefully it still works...
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists