[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061012171659.GC10816@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:16:59 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
mm-commits@...r.kernel.org, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>, torvalds@...l.org,
akpm@...l.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, pbadari@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 16/67] jbd: fix commit of ordered data buffers
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:55:38PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> There does not seem to be any obvious issues with this change and it
> fixes a real BUG happenning during some stress-testing. On the other hand
> the change is kind of intrusive and changes a quite complex code (or
> better said code with complex interactions). So I'm not sure if it really is
> -stable material...
I think it is, as it does fix a real issue, and the same patch is in
mainline now too.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists