linux-kernel - Re: Keyboard Stuttering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:45:08 -0700
From:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To:	Lee Revell <rlrevell@...-job.com>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Frank Sorenson <frank@...rocks.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Gerber <dg-lkml@...ek.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: Keyboard Stuttering

On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 12:12 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 11:25 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 13:09 -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > Same problem here. Intel Core 2 Duo with 2.6.19-rc1 x86_64 SMP. Happens on
> > > > 2.6.17 too. I use 'noapic' as a workaround but that disables one of the CPU
> > > > core of course.
> > > >
> > > > I cannot reproduce the problem within the console nor gdm. Only on the X
> > > > desktop.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > It looks like the only clocksource available on David's box is
> > > "jiffies" although the processor shows that it supporst tsc and PM
> > > timer is enabled and I think that this is what causes keyboard
> > > stuttering in X. See http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7291.
> > > I believe clocksources is your turf, could you please take a look at
> > > this.
> > 
> > Sure thing. I followed up in the bug, but I don't think the clocksource
> > code is involved. x86_64 hasn't converted to GENERIC_TIME, so jiffies is
> > what we use to increment xtime, but the TSC, ACPI PM, or HPET is used
> > for gettimeofday, etc. 
> > 
> > I suspect C3 idling is the culprit, since noapic works around the issue.
> 
> Wait, does this mean that Intel's x86-64 implementation has the same
> buggy TSC as AMD's?

Not the same issue, no.. but the TSCs do halt in lower powersaving
modes, which can cause similar results. The new TSC clocksource code on
i386 will disqualify itself if those lower powerstates are entered, so
it should auto detect and fall back. On x86_64, this logic apparently is
sill needed.

thanks
-john


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/