linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061014140249.GL11633@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:02:49 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	Val Henson <val_henson@...ux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:41:35PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Bisection shows that this patch
> (pci-check-that-mwi-bit-really-did-get-set.patch in Greg's PCI tree) breaks
> suspend-to-disk on my Vaio.  It writes the suspend image and gets to the
> point where it's supposed to power down, but doesn't.

How odd.  What driver is calling pci_set_mwi() on the suspend path?
What drivers do you have loaded on the Vaio?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/