[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160870637.5732.46.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 01:03:57 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: John Richard Moser <nigelenki@...cast.net>
Cc: Kevin K <k_krieser@...global.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
Ar Sad, 2006-10-14 am 17:44 -0400, ysgrifennodd John Richard Moser:
> Yeah, a static code coverage analyzer or some sort of code-reducer would
> be nice; these are in general pipe dreams but eh. Also these are
> compressed bzip2 tarball sizes, not compiled kernel sizes or source tree
> sizes. I would imagine a 100MB bzip2 would turn into something quite
> large; the major issue is the amount of work it takes to maintain
> something like that.
It's not actually clear that you can sensibly evaluate trends like that
or the maintainability. Take a look at the flamewar the day the kernel
tarball stopped fitting on one floppy disk (1.44MB)
Things ceasing to be maintained and exiting the kernel is a two step
process and there is a lot in the "waiting for someone to rescue it"
stage that probably has no remaining users. At some point nor far away
there is going to be a big flush of drivers when ISA bus is dropped.
Microsoft are also being very helpful. They are making it harder and
harder for people to use drivers not microsoft-signed which in turns
pushes up costs for development and as a result encourages more
standardization of driver interfaces to take place.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists