[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200610161208.13628.ak@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:08:13 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: eranian@....hp.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 add missing enter_idle() calls
On Friday 06 October 2006 10:16, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unless I am mistaken, I think we are missing some calls to enter_idle()
> in the x86_64 tree. The following patch adds a bunch of missing
> enter_idle() callbacks for some of the "direct" interrupt handlers.
>
> changelog:
> - adds missing enter_idle() calls to most of the "direct" interrupt
> handlers.
HLT returns after an interrupt and then does enter_idle()
At least that's the theory. Do you have any evidence it doesn't work?
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists