linux-kernel - Re: [Patch] x86_64 hot-add memroy srat.c fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200610161201.16140.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:01:16 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	kmannth@...ibm.com
Cc:	andrew <akpm@...l.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Konrad redhat <konradr@...hat.com>, dzickus@...hat.com,
	lhms-devel <lhms-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch] x86_64 hot-add memroy srat.c fix

On Saturday 07 October 2006 00:53, keith mannthey wrote:
>   This patch corrects the logic used in srat.c to figure out what
> parsing what action to take when registering hot-add areas.  Hot-add
> areas should only be added to the node information for the
> MEMORY_HOTPLGU_RESERVE case.  When booting MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE hot-add
> areas on everything but the last node are getting include in the node
> data and during kernel boot the pages are setup then the kernel dies
> when the pages are used. This patch fixes this issue.  It is based
> against 2.6.19-rc1.  

Added thanks, especially since it's a obvious typo.

If that patch was added to .19 does sparsemem hotadd work then or does it
need more patches?

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/