| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20061019173108.GA28700@tau.solarneutrino.net> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:31:08 -0400 From: Ryan Richter <ryan@....solarneutrino.net> To: Keith Whitwell <keith@...gstengraphics.com> Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>, dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Intel 965G: i915_dispatch_cmdbuffer failed (2.6.19-rc2) On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:54:41AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > This is all a little confusing as the driver doesn't really use that > path in normal operation except for a single command - MI_FLUSH, which > is shared between the architectures. In normal operation the hardware > does the validation for us for the bulk of the command stream. If there > were missing functionality in that ioctl, it would be failing > everywhere, not just in this one case. > > I guess the questions I'd have are > - did the driver work before the kernel upgrade? > - what path in userspace is seeing you end up in this ioctl? > - and like Keith, what commands are you seeing? > > The final question is interesting not because we want to extend the > ioctl to cover those, but because it will give a clue how you ended up > there in the first place. Here's a list of all the failing commands I've seen so far: 3a440003 d70003 2d010003 e5b90003 2e730003 8d8c0003 c10003 d90003 be0003 1e3f0003 -ryan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists