[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4537B9FB.7050303@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 03:46:35 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Fix COW D-cache aliasing on fork
Ralf Baechle wrote:
> From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
>
> Problem:
>
> 1. There is a process containing two thread (T1 and T2). The
> thread T1 calls fork(). Then dup_mmap() function called on T1 context.
>
> static inline int dup_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_struct *oldmm)
> ...
> flush_cache_mm(current->mm);
> ... /* A */
> (write-protect all Copy-On-Write pages)
> ... /* B */
> flush_tlb_mm(current->mm);
> ...
>
> 2. When preemption happens between A and B (or on SMP kernel), the
> thread T2 can run and modify data on COW pages without page fault
> (modified data will stay in cache).
>
> 3. Some time after fork() completed, the thread T2 may cause a page
> fault by write-protect on a COW page.
>
> 4. Then data of the COW page will be copied to newly allocated
> physical page (copy_cow_page()). It reads data via kernel mapping.
> The kernel mapping can have different 'color' with user space
> mapping of the thread T2 (dcache aliasing). Therefore
> copy_cow_page() will copy stale data. Then the modified data in
> cache will be lost.
What about if you just flush the caches after write protecting all
COW pages? Would that work? Simpler? Better performance? (I don't know)
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists