[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45393CBD.8000400@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:16:45 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] more helpful WARN_ON and BUG_ON messages
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> After a few bugs I encountered in FC6 in buffer.c, with output like:
>
> Kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c: 2791
>
> where buffer.c contains:
>
> ...
> BUG_ON(!buffer_locked(bh));
> BUG_ON(!buffer_mapped(bh));
> BUG_ON(!bh->b_end_io);
> ...
>
> around line 2790, it's awfully tedious to go get the exact failing kernel tree
> just to see -which- BUG_ON was encountered.
>
> Printing out the failing condition as a string would make this more helpful IMHO.
>
This seems like a generally useful idea - certainly more valuable than
storing+printing the function name.
You might want to look at the BUG patches I wrote, which are currently
in -mm. I added general machinery to allow architectures to easily
implement BUG() efficiently (ie, with a minimal amount of BUG-related
icache pollution). If you were to store the BUG_ON expression, it would
be best to extend struct bug_entry and store it there - doing it in
asm-generic BUG_ON() means you still end up with code to set up the
printk in the mainline code path, and it also won't honour
CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE being disabled.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists