linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS: Make d_materialise_unique() enforce directory uniqueness

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1161320058.5497.12.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
Date:	Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:54:18 -0400
From:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS: Make d_materialise_unique() enforce directory
	uniqueness

On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 21:40 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:03:58 -0400
> Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com> wrote:
> 
> > +static struct dentry *__d_unalias(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *alias)
> > +{
> > +	struct mutex *m1 = NULL, *m2 = NULL;
> > +	struct dentry *ret;
> > +
> > +	/* If alias and dentry share a parent, then no extra locks required */
> > +	if (alias->d_parent == dentry->d_parent)
> > +		goto out_unalias;
> > +
> > +	/* Check for loops */
> > +	ret = ERR_PTR(-ELOOP);
> > +	if (d_isparent(alias, dentry))
> > +		goto out_err;
> > +
> > +	/* See lock_rename() */
> > +	ret = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
> > +	if (!mutex_trylock(&dentry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex))
> > +		goto out_err;
> > +	m1 = &dentry->d_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex;
> > +	if (!mutex_trylock(&alias->d_parent->d_inode->i_mutex))
> > +		goto out_err;
> > +	m2 = &alias->d_parent->d_inode->i_mutex;
> > +out_unalias:
> > +	d_move_locked(alias, dentry);
> > +	ret = alias;
> > +out_err:
> > +	spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
> > +	if (m2)
> > +		mutex_unlock(m2);
> > +	if (m1)
> > +		mutex_unlock(m1);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> 
> The locking in there is, of course, gruesome.  There is no way in which it
> can be made reliable?

The generic lookup() code will grab the dir->i_mutex for the parent
directory before we get anywhere near __d_alias(). That pretty much
limits us to using mutex_trylock() since otherwise we break the nesting
rules for lock_rename(), and I can't see that we can release the
problematic dir->i_mutex without causing worse races.

Cheers,
  Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/