linux-kernel - Re: futex hang with rpm in 2.6.17.1-2174

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 21 Oct 2006 14:00:05 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: futex hang with rpm in 2.6.17.1-2174_FC5

On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 10:45:02AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
 > Dave Jones wrote:
 > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:38:58AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
 > >  > I had a dead nfs server that was causing some programs to pause,
 > >  > in particular 'yum install foo' was paused.  I kill -9'd the
 > >  > yum related processes.
 > >  > 
 > > The dead rpm you killed left behind locks in its databases.
 > > rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db* and it should work again.
 > >   
 > I'll give that a try, but shouldn't these locks clean themselves up when the
 > process is killed

If you kill -9'd the processes, what do you expect to do
the clean up work ?

 > or shouldn't rpm notice the previous process is dead and
 > clean it up itself?
 
Sounds sensible to me and you, but in the past sensible ideas and
rpm maintainers haven't gone hand in hand.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/