[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <453A622C.2020401@candelatech.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 11:08:44 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: futex hang with rpm in 2.6.17.1-2174_FC5
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 10:45:02AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> > Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:38:58AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> > > > I had a dead nfs server that was causing some programs to pause,
> > > > in particular 'yum install foo' was paused. I kill -9'd the
> > > > yum related processes.
> > > >
> > > The dead rpm you killed left behind locks in its databases.
> > > rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db* and it should work again.
> > >
> > I'll give that a try, but shouldn't these locks clean themselves up when the
> > process is killed
>
> If you kill -9'd the processes, what do you expect to do
> the clean up work ?
>
Well, you can do tricks with file handles so that they are automatically
closed/deleted when
a process exits, even with kill -9. Since this lock is evidently
something in the kernel (since the kernel
call is blocking), then it seems like a similar trick could be crafted.
> > or shouldn't rpm notice the previous process is dead and
> > clean it up itself?
>
> Sounds sensible to me and you, but in the past sensible ideas and
> rpm maintainers haven't gone hand in hand.
>
Ahhh :)
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists