[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061022013427.GA17694@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 03:34:27 +0200
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc2-mm2 : empty files on vfat file system
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 01:24:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:19:32 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 19:38:49 +0200
> > Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr> wrote:
> >
> > > > --- a/fs/fat/inode.c~fs-prepare_write-fixes
> > > > +++ a/fs/fat/inode.c
> > > > @@ -150,7 +150,11 @@ static int fat_commit_write(struct file
> > > > unsigned from, unsigned to)
> > > > {
> > > > struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
> > > > - int err = generic_commit_write(file, page, from, to);
> > > > + int err;
> > > > + if (to - from > 0)
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +
> >
> > That should have been
> >
> > if (to - from == 0)
> > return 0;
>
> otoh, it's still wrong that we're not updating i_size. We happen to know
> that the caller will retry without dropping i_mutex, but it's a bit
> incestuous.
It can possibly fail for example if the source buffer gets unmapped.
However in the length == 0 case, that signals a failure to write anything
so we needn't update i_size, I think?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists