linux-kernel - Re: First benchmarks of the ext4 file system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200610220145.55497.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
Date:	Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:45:55 +0100
From:	Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@....ed.ac.uk>
To:	"Linux Portal" <linportal@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: First benchmarks of the ext4 file system

On Sunday 22 October 2006 00:57, Linux Portal wrote:
> ext4 is 20 percent faster writer than ext3 or reiser4, probably thanks
> to extents and delayed allocation. On other tests it is either
> slightly faster or slightly slower. reiser4 comes as a nice surprise,
> winning few benchmarks. Both are very stable, no errors during
> testing.
>
> http://linux.inet.hr/first_benchmarks_of_the_ext4_file_system.html

If you get a chance, some similar benchmarks including other major filesystems 
like JFS, XFS and ReiserFS3 would be nice. People keep using the same old 
results but don't realise performance of Linux filesystems changes from 
kernel to kernel..

-- 
Cheers,
Alistair.

Final year Computer Science undergraduate.
1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/