[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061021234923.defbfb1f.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:49:23 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: "Linux Portal" <linportal@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: First benchmarks of the ext4 file system
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:57:36 +0200
"Linux Portal" <linportal@...il.com> wrote:
> ext4 is 20 percent faster writer than ext3 or reiser4, probably thanks
> to extents and delayed allocation. On other tests it is either
> slightly faster or slightly slower. reiser4 comes as a nice surprise,
> winning few benchmarks. Both are very stable, no errors during
> testing.
>
> http://linux.inet.hr/first_benchmarks_of_the_ext4_file_system.html
ext4 doesn't implement delayed allocation (yet).
I made some observations regarding comparative benchmarking of filesystems
when releasing 2.6.19-rc1-mm1. They seem to have been ignored ;) See
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc1/2.6.19-rc1-mm1/announce.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists