| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ceccffee0610220542t422647e1of507047f6777649e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:42:51 +0200 From: "Linux Portal" <linportal@...il.com> To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: First benchmarks of the ext4 file system On 10/22/06, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote: > On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:57:36 +0200 > "Linux Portal" <linportal@...il.com> wrote: > > > ext4 is 20 percent faster writer than ext3 or reiser4, probably thanks > > to extents and delayed allocation. On other tests it is either > > slightly faster or slightly slower. reiser4 comes as a nice surprise, > > winning few benchmarks. Both are very stable, no errors during > > testing. > > > > http://linux.inet.hr/first_benchmarks_of_the_ext4_file_system.html > > ext4 doesn't implement delayed allocation (yet). > > I made some observations regarding comparative benchmarking of filesystems > when releasing 2.6.19-rc1-mm1. They seem to have been ignored ;) See > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc1/2.6.19-rc1-mm1/announce.txt > > Yeah, and because of this: "Although this doesn't seem to make much difference with ext3" which is what I observed, too, in some other benchmarks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists