lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:42:51 +0200
From:	"Linux Portal" <linportal@...il.com>
To:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: First benchmarks of the ext4 file system

On 10/22/06, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:57:36 +0200
> "Linux Portal" <linportal@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > ext4 is 20 percent faster writer than ext3 or reiser4, probably thanks
> > to extents and delayed allocation. On other tests it is either
> > slightly faster or slightly slower. reiser4 comes as a nice surprise,
> > winning few benchmarks. Both are very stable, no errors during
> > testing.
> >
> > http://linux.inet.hr/first_benchmarks_of_the_ext4_file_system.html
>
> ext4 doesn't implement delayed allocation (yet).
>
> I made some observations regarding comparative benchmarking of filesystems
> when releasing 2.6.19-rc1-mm1.  They seem to have been ignored ;)  See
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc1/2.6.19-rc1-mm1/announce.txt
>
>

Yeah, and because of this: "Although this doesn't seem to make much
difference with ext3" which is what I observed, too, in some other
benchmarks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists