linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc1 full] drivers: add LCD support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <653402b90610230908y2be5007dga050c78ee3993d81@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:08:44 +0200
From:	"Miguel Ojeda" <maxextreme@...il.com>
To:	Franck <vagabon.xyz@...il.com>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc1 full] drivers: add LCD support

On 10/23/06, Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@...il.com> wrote:
> Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > The driver is waiting in the -mm tree (-mm2 right now) for being
> > included in the mainline kernel sometime in the future. If it is
> > included, I will maintain it as I coded it as it apears in the
> > MAINTAINERS file. Why are you so worried about it if I can ask? Do you
> > want some more features or something like that?
>
> Are you sure the patch you sent to Andrew is your latest patch
> version ? For example I can't found any locks in the patch that
> you normally added during the V6 patch version; auxlcddisplay.c
> doesn't no exist...
>
>                 Franck
>

Yes, we are sure. AFAIK there is no need to lock when it is a fbdev.
The older version were "alone" drivers: they needed to lock because
they used fops and they exported functions.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/