[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <453D27F8.8020509@qumranet.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:37:12 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/13] KVM: vcpu execution loop
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 23 October 2006 22:16, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>>> This looks like you should simply put it into a .S file.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Then I lose all the offsetof constants down the line. Sure, I could do
>> the asm-offsets dance but it seems to me like needless obfuscation.
>>
>
> Ok, I see.
>
> How if you pass &vcpu->regs and &vcpu->cr2 to the functions instead of
> kvm_vcpu?
>
>
I could do that, but I feel that's more brittle. I might need more (or
other) fields later on. It will also cost me more pushes on the stack
(no real performance or space impact, just C64-era frugality).
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists