linux-kernel - Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020610240512y80a41bblcf8ce08c3875c008@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:12:39 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc:	"Giridhar Pemmasani" <pgiri@...oo.com>,
	"Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper

On 10/24/06, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
> The kernel should not depend on a not-in-tree kernel module to
> taint the kernel.  The kernel can and should do that itself.

Agreed. But should the kernel disallow the use of _GPL symbols for
ndiswrapper? I would say no.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/