[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0610241408000.1852@pcgl.dsa-ac.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:14:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <gl@...-ac.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.18-rt6] BUG / typo
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
>> [22644.590000] BUG: scheduling with irqs disabled:
>> posix_cpu_timer/0x00000001/2
>> [22644.590000] caller is schedule+0x10/0x118
> [...]
>
> Hm, got the same BUG with the patch from the previous email. Looking further,
> unless somebody has an idea?
Could the reason have been that I in my (pxa) timer ISR had
irq_enter()/_exit around the call to handle_event, as suggested in
i386/kernel/apic.c:
/*
* update_process_times() expects us to have done irq_enter().
* Besides, if we don't timer interrupts ignore the global
* interrupt lock, which is the WrongThing (tm) to do.
*/
irq_enter();
/*
* If the task is currently running in user mode, don't
* detect soft lockups. If CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP is not
* configured, this should be optimized out.
*/
if (user_mode(regs))
touch_softlockup_watchdog();
evt->event_handler(regs);
irq_exit();
? Anyway, I cannot SEEM to reproduce it anymore now I've removed those
calls. Will test further.
Thanks
Guennadi
---------------------------------
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
DSA Daten- und Systemtechnik GmbH
Pascalstr. 28
D-52076 Aachen
Germany
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists