[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1161719603.8946.84.camel@farscape>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:53:22 -0500
From: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@...t.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, cbe-oss-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] spufs: fix another off-by-one bug in mbox_read
On Tue, 2006-24-10 at 21:07 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 October 2006 20:42, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On 10/24/06, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > > spu_acquire(ctx);
> > > - for (count = 0; count <= len; count += 4, udata++) {
> > > + for (count = 0; (count + 4) <= len; count += 4, udata++) {
> >
> > Wouldn't this be more obvious as
> >
> > for (count = 0, count < (len / 4); count++, udata++) {
> >
> > And then do count * 4 if you need the actual index somewhere. Hmm?
>
> Count is the return value from a write() file operation. I find it
> more readable to update that every time I do one put_user(), to
> the exact value, than calculating the return code later.
Hey Arnd,
just curiosity.. What was the behavior before this patch? just
leaving a few (0 - 3) characters behind?
>
> Arnd <><
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists