[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061026181055.GT4868@rhun.haifa.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:10:55 +0200
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@....com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reuse vector for __assign_irq_vector
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:04:57AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Andi,
> please check the revised patch: It can be appied to current linus't tree.
>
> in phys flat mode, when using set_xxx_irq_affinity to irq balance from
> one cpu to another, _assign_irq_vector will get to increase last used
> vector and get new vector. this will use up the vector if enough
> set_xxx_irq_affintiy are called. and end with using same vector in
> different cpu for different irq. (that is not what we want, we only
> want to use same vector in different cpu for different irq when more
> than 0x240 irq needed). To keep it simple, the vector should be reused
> instead of getting new vector.
>
> Also according to Eric's review, make it more generic to be used with
> flat mode too.
>
> It also check if new domain and old domain is equal, to avoid extra
> operation.
Works fine for mee.
Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists