[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <slrnek4vfg.39b.olecom@flower.upol.cz>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 21:38:37 +0000 (UTC)
From: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PnP Bios activation of parallel port prior to request_region
On 2006-10-26, Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com> wrote:
> While working with a very simple demo parallel port interrupt driver, I found
> that request_region() will successfully return, regardless of whether or not
> the pnp calls have been made to activite the parallel port on a pnp system.
>
> The driver worked by just calling request_region() on another system, but on
> my laptop it wouldn't work unless I made the pnp activation calls before
> hand. The confusion came because the io range got assigned to my module,
> showed up in /proc/ioports, etc. So it appeared to be properly configured,
> but all the inb() calls returned 0xff.
>
> I know have something working, but just wanted to ask if it is considered
"now"?
> correct behavior for request_region() to succeed on an io range pertaining to
> a device that needs to be initialized by the pnp system and hasn't been.
I know that legacy parallel port must work regadless of any parport
modules, using /dev/port and BIOS setup for EPP/ECP etc.
If you really want to be answered, try to address message (or cc) to
e-mails mentioned in
- `linux/MAINTAINERS.*PARALLEL PORT*'
- `linux/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c'
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists