[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0610271443500.31179@attu2.cs.washington.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...washington.edu>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
Neil Brown <neilb@....unsw.edu.au>, nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: nfsaclsvc_encode_getaclres() - Fix potential NULL
deref and tiny optimization.
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> In fs/nfsd/nfs2acl.c::nfsaclsvc_encode_getaclres() I see a few issues.
>
> 1) At the top of the function we assign to the 'inode' variable by
> dereferencing 'dentry', but further down we test 'dentry' for NULL. So, if
> 'dentry' (which is really 'resp->fh.fh_dentry') can be NULL, then either
> we have a potential NULL pointer deref bug or we have a superflous test.
>
resp->fh.fh_dentry cannot be NULL on nfsaclsvc_encode_getaclres so the
early assignment is appropriate for both *dentry and *inode. *inode will
need to be checked for NULL in the conditional, however, and return 0 on
true.
> 3) There are two locations in the function where we may return before we
> use the value of the variable 'w', but we compute it at the very top of the
> function. So in the case where we return early we have wasted a few cycles
> computing a value that was never used.
>
w should be an unsigned int.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists